records almost instantly. The FDA found “reasonable assurance” the device was safe and a sub-agency even called it one of 2005’s top “innovative technologies.” But neither the company nor the regulators publicly mentioned this: A series of veterinary and toxicology studies dating to the mid-1990s stated that divide implants had “induced” malignant tumors in some lab mice and rats. “The transponders were the create of the tumors,” said Keith Johnson a retired toxicologic pathologist explaining in a telecommunicate interview the findings of a 1996 chew over he led at the Dow Chemical Co in Midland. Mich. Leading cancer specialists reviewed the investigate for The Associated touch and while cautioning that animal test results do not necessarily bear on to humans said the findings troubled them. Some said they would not allow family members to acquire implants and all urged advance investigate before the glass-encased transponders are widely implanted in people. To date about 2,000 of the so-called radio frequency identification or RFID devices undergo been implanted in humans worldwide according to VeriChip Corp. The company which sees a target merchandise of 45 million Americans for its medical monitoring chips insists the devices are safe as does its parent affiliate. Applied Digital Solutions of Delray Beach. Fla. “We stand by our implantable products which have been approved by the FDA and/or other U. S regulatory authorities,” Scott Silverman. VeriChip Corp chairman and chief executive officer said in a written response to AP questions. The company was “not aware of any studies that undergo resulted in malignant tumors in laboratory rats mice and certainly not dogs or cats,” but he added that millions of domestic pets have been implanted with microchips without reports of significant problems. “In fact for more than 15 years we have used our encapsulated furnish transponders with FDA approved anti-migration caps and received no complaints regarding malignant tumors caused by our product.” The FDA also stands by its approval of the technology. Did the agency know of the tumor findings before approving the chip implants? The FDA declined repeated AP requests to specify what studies it reviewed. The FDA is overseen by the Department of
and Human Services which at the measure of VeriChip’s approval was headed by Tommy Thompson. Two weeks after the device’s approval took cause on Jan. 10. 2005. Thompson left his Cabinet post and within five months was a board member of VeriChip Corp and Applied Digital Solutions. He was compensated in change and have options. Thompson until recently a candidate for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination says he had no personal relationship with the affiliate as the VeriChip was being evaluated nor did he compete any role in FDA’s approval affect of the RFID tag. “I didn’t even know VeriChip before I stepped down from the Department of Health and Human Services,” he said in a telephone converse. Also making no have in mind of the findings on animal tumors was a June report by the ethics committee of the American Medical Association which touted the benefits of implantable RFID devices. Had committee members reviewed the literature on cancer in chipped animals? No said Dr. Steven lade an AMA board member with knowledge of the committee’s review. Was the AMA aware of the studies? No he said.
Cruise 4 Cash -
Detective Sherlock -
Free Bid Auctions -
Expert Poker Tips -
Shop 4 Money
Win Any Lottery -
Repo Car Search -
Psychics 4 Free -
High Quality Games -
Driving 4 Dollars
Related article:
http://viagra-sales-in-the-uk.pharmaciesgenetic.com/2007/09/09/are-implanted-microchips-safe/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
